Florence vs Milan for a high earner: tax, residence, cost, and life compared

	Florence	Milan
Effective tax at $300K	43%	43%
Effective tax at $1M	45%	45%
Effective tax at $3M	45%	45%
Kept at $1M	$553K	$553K
Capital gains	26%	26%
Cost index (Zurich 100)	75	78
Safety	7/10	6/10
Schools	7/10	8/10
Sun hours	2,300	1,900
Supercar street index	#73	#32
Routes in	Golden visa, Lump sum residence, Founder & talent	Golden visa, Lump sum residence, Founder & talent
Net millionaire inflow 2025 (country, Henley)	+3,600	+3,600
Flight London	2.6	2.3
Flight New York	9.2	8.9

Simplified marginal model, indicative 2026 brackets, non-US single filer, no social contributions, deductions, wealth taxes, or treaties.

Verdicts

Who should pick which.

For an executive on salary

Milan keeps more of a $1M salary, $0 a year on this model. Florence answers with safety.

For a founder with an exit

Capital gains land at 26% in both. The order of operations, move then sell or sell then move, decides more than the rate. Neither city taxes wealth as such.

For a family

Milan leads on schools, Florence on safety, a lower cost and sun.

FlorenceThe full page MilanThe full page Rank both on my numbersThe engine, 90 seconds

The Dossier: Florence, Milan, and the third you have not considered.Your top 3 modeled on your income, exit, passports, and family. 10 chapters, about 40 pages, as a PDF within 24 hours. $249, refunded within 7 days if it does not change how you think.

Get the Dossier

Your position, not the average

This page is the general case. Your income and passports rank all 100 differently.

The engine takes what you earn and what you hold, then orders every address on the board against it.

Rank the board against my position →

90 seconds. No account, no payment.

Tax figures use a simplified marginal model with indicative 2026 brackets for a non-US single filer, ignore social contributions, most deductions, wealth taxes, and treaties, and are not advice. Residence rules change often. Verify before acting.