Head to head

Hong Kong vs Phuket.

🇭🇰 Hong Kong SAR against 🇹🇭 Thailand, on tax, residence, cost, and the life. Same model, same year, no brochure.

Hong KongPhuket
Effective tax at $300K16%30%
Effective tax at $1M16%34%
Effective tax at $3M16%35%
Kept at $1M$840K$665K
Capital gains0%35%
Cost index (Zurich 100)10250
Safety9/106/10
Schools9/106/10
Sun hours1,8302,700
Supercar street index#13#80
Routes inGolden visa, Founder & talentGolden visa, Remote work visa
Net millionaire inflow 2025 (country, Henley)n/an/a
Flight London12.713
Flight New York16.718.6

Simplified marginal model, indicative 2026 brackets, non-US single filer, no social contributions, deductions, wealth taxes, or treaties.

Verdicts

Who should pick which.

For an executive on salary

Hong Kong keeps more of a $1M salary, $175K a year on this model. Phuket answers with the life itself.

For a founder with an exit

Capital gains: Hong Kong 0%, Phuket 35%. The order of operations, move then sell or sell then move, decides more than the rate. Neither city taxes wealth as such.

For a family

Hong Kong leads on schools and safety, Phuket on a lower cost and sun.

The Dossier: Hong Kong, Phuket, and the third you have not considered.Your top 3 modeled on your income, exit, passports, and family. 10 chapters, about 40 pages, as a PDF within 24 hours. $249, refunded within 7 days if it does not change how you think.
Get the Dossier
Your position, not the average

This page is the general case. Your income and passports rank all 100 differently.

The engine takes what you earn and what you hold, then orders every address on the board against it.

Rank the board against my position →

90 seconds. No account, no payment.

Tax figures use a simplified marginal model with indicative 2026 brackets for a non-US single filer, ignore social contributions, most deductions, wealth taxes, and treaties, and are not advice. Residence rules change often. Verify before acting.