Head to head

Singapore vs Sydney.

🇸🇬 Singapore against 🇦🇺 Australia, on tax, residence, cost, and the life. Same model, same year, no brochure.

SingaporeSydney
Effective tax at $300K16%40%
Effective tax at $1M21%45%
Effective tax at $3M23%46%
Kept at $1M$791K$552K
Capital gains0%24%
Cost index (Zurich 100)9890
Safety10/109/10
Schools10/109/10
Sun hours2,0202,590
Supercar street index#28#38
Routes inGolden visa, Founder & talentFounder & talent
Net millionaire inflow 2025 (country, Henley)+1,600+1,000
Flight London14.221.6
Flight New York19.620.4

Simplified marginal model, indicative 2026 brackets, non-US single filer, no social contributions, deductions, wealth taxes, or treaties.

Verdicts

Who should pick which.

For an executive on salary

Singapore keeps more of a $1M salary, $239K a year on this model. Sydney answers with the life itself.

For a founder with an exit

Capital gains: Singapore 0%, Sydney 24%. The order of operations, move then sell or sell then move, decides more than the rate. Neither city taxes wealth as such.

For a family

Singapore leads on schools and safety, Sydney on a lower cost and sun.

The Dossier: Singapore, Sydney, and the third you have not considered.Your top 3 modeled on your income, exit, passports, and family. 10 chapters, about 40 pages, as a PDF within 24 hours. $249, refunded within 7 days if it does not change how you think.
Get the Dossier
Your position, not the average

This page is the general case. Your income and passports rank all 100 differently.

The engine takes what you earn and what you hold, then orders every address on the board against it.

Rank the board against my position →

90 seconds. No account, no payment.

Tax figures use a simplified marginal model with indicative 2026 brackets for a non-US single filer, ignore social contributions, most deductions, wealth taxes, and treaties, and are not advice. Residence rules change often. Verify before acting.