
🇸🇬 Singapore against 🇦🇺 Australia, on tax, residence, cost, and the life. Same model, same year, no brochure.
| Singapore | Sydney | |
|---|---|---|
| Effective tax at $300K | 16% | 40% |
| Effective tax at $1M | 21% | 45% |
| Effective tax at $3M | 23% | 46% |
| Kept at $1M | $791K | $552K |
| Capital gains | 0% | 24% |
| Cost index (Zurich 100) | 98 | 90 |
| Safety | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Schools | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Sun hours | 2,020 | 2,590 |
| Supercar street index | #28 | #38 |
| Routes in | Golden visa, Founder & talent | Founder & talent |
| Net millionaire inflow 2025 (country, Henley) | +1,600 | +1,000 |
| Flight London | 14.2 | 21.6 |
| Flight New York | 19.6 | 20.4 |
Simplified marginal model, indicative 2026 brackets, non-US single filer, no social contributions, deductions, wealth taxes, or treaties.
Singapore keeps more of a $1M salary, $239K a year on this model. Sydney answers with the life itself.
Capital gains: Singapore 0%, Sydney 24%. The order of operations, move then sell or sell then move, decides more than the rate. Neither city taxes wealth as such.
Singapore leads on schools and safety, Sydney on a lower cost and sun.
The engine takes what you earn and what you hold, then orders every address on the board against it.
Rank the board against my position →90 seconds. No account, no payment.
Tax figures use a simplified marginal model with indicative 2026 brackets for a non-US single filer, ignore social contributions, most deductions, wealth taxes, and treaties, and are not advice. Residence rules change often. Verify before acting.